Contribution in the report on Trade Secrets Litigation in the EU prepared for the European Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Our Partner, Dimitris Synodinos contributed to the report on “Trade Secrets Litigation in the European Union”  produced by the Università degli Studi di Torino, Dipartimento di Giurisprudenza (University of Turin Law School) for the European Union Intellectual Property Office in accordance with Article 18 of Directive (EU) 2016/943 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on the protection of undisclosed know-how and business information (trade secrets) against their unlawful acquisition, use and disclosure.

The report represents a comprehensive and thorough analysis of trade secrets litigation trends in the EU and shows the level of harmonisation achieved after the implementation of the provisions of the Trade Secrets Directive within the boundaries of the subject matter’s inherent complexity. The report consists of three parts: a quantitative analysis, a qualitative analysis, and a collection of case-law summaries.

The quantitative analysis is based on statistical trends observed in approximately 700 judgments issued in the period between 1 January 2017 and 31 October 2022 and reveals a number of differences across Member States in terms of case volumes, legal fora and subject matter, as well as economic sectors concerned.

The qualitative analysis provides a theoretical discussion on the interpretation of the definition of trade secrets, unlawful acts, the measures granted under the Trade Secrets Directive, and the principle of proportionality. Moreover, it identifies significant developments in the interpretation of the ‘reasonable steps’ requirement for meeting the definition of ‘trade secret’ and the issue of procedural measures for the preservation of confidentiality of trade secrets during litigation proceedings.

The case-law collection provides an overview of selected cases on trade secrets issued by the courts of the Member States. As trade secrets litigation trends are still developing, and the Court of Justice of the EU has not yet had the opportunity to provide clarification on key provisions of the Trade Secrets Directive, this collection represents a valuable resource for defining litigation trends not just in the Member States from which they stem but also at EU level.

The report is a solid benchmark for policy makers, legal practitioners and academics, as well as being a helpful tool for businesses, including small- and medium-sized enterprises to better understand the value of trade secrets and the possible ways to protect them in a highly competitive environment.

A full piece of the report can be found here 

Collective management of rights: Overview of the legal framework of Independent Management Entities (IMEs) in Greece

Overview of the legal framework of Independent Management Entities (IMEs) in Greece With articles 2 §6, 4 §8 and article 32 of law 4481/2017, article 2 §4 and article 36 §1 of Directive 2014/26/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on the collective management of copyright and related rights […]

Continue Reading

Deceptive Trademarks in European Trademark Law and their invalidation on the grounds of Article 7 (1) (g) of the European Trademark Regulation

According to European Trademark Law, third parties have the right to file an application for the invalidation of a registered European Union Trademark based on the absolute grounds for refusal under Article 7 of the European Trademark Regulation 207/2009. One of the most technical and not easily conceivable grounds of refusal is the one included […]

Continue Reading

Linking to protected works published online with the consent of the copyright holder-Comments on the Svensson case of the CJEU (C-466/12)

1) Brief Summary of the Case The famous Svensson case concerned literary works (news articles) which have been initially published by the Swedish publisher “Göteborgs-Posten”, both in its newspaper and its official website. The claimants had not applied any specific technical measures for restricting the access to its protected content (e.g. no pay walls or […]

Continue Reading